To state my crisis plainly, I feel as though I can no longer
go back and forth believing in God and feeling a sense of identity (calling) in
the ministry and rejecting God and pursuing more earthly pleasures and calling
the struggle organic, real, or postmodern. The arguments I have heard for a
belief in God feels more like a justification in God than I real reason to
believe in God. But to reject God means to reject all forms of meaning and no
atheist argument for meaning without God seem like anything more than
justification for meaning without God. So for me, the argument is not about do
I believe in God or not, but do I believe that this life has meaning or not.
This is when then crisis turns to one of philosophy instead of theology.
Meaning is inherently both subjective and objective. While meaning has an
objective component in that we don’t have to be aware of the meaning and will
always fall short of grasping the full extent of meaning, it also has a subject
component in that it is affective and individual. To elaborate on the
individual nature of meaning, that must account for true individual,
experiential, and psychological creations of meaning and corporate meaning that
is based in community, traditions, and sociological creations of meaning. To turn
the argument away from theological and philosophical and into the realm of
developmental, when one considers all the factors that attribute to our
understanding of meaning a belief in God becomes a construct on a reality that
is more determinant of our relationship to GOD than any objective reality. In
other words, my evangelical and zealous understanding of God as a youth is
radically different than my liberal and postmodern understanding of GOD today
and therefore I relate to that GOD quite differently. The objective meaning of
GOD is only the construct by which I relate my theology, philosophy, and
identity to despite the fact that the same objective meaning is so radically
different that it cannot accurately be called the same GOD. (However, based on
the definition of objective reality that I have already selected, this can be
the same God since objective reality extends beyond our understanding.)
The consequences of this crisis have left me both rejecting
God and embracing God at the same time. For the past couple of years (as I have
embraced a more postmodern-friendly concept of God) I have been able to live
quite contently with this paradoxical spiritual development. It allowed me to
experience God in new ways and deconstruct old, worn out ideas about God that
worked against my development. I could see myself as an atheist and devout
Christian at the same times. I have felt little need to resolve any
inconsistencies and simply experience God as “He” chose to reveal “Himself” to
me. This has not been disingenuous as GOD has been a significantly less
person-like and possibly less bible-like entity. It has been a time of much
greater integrity in my beliefs system as I have focused less on beliefs and
more on meaning. However, even in this time of awakening, I have felt that my
path has taken me further and further away from a life that love. And now I see
that the duality within has moved to a place of new tension where I no longer
believe in anything and have no tie to any world. I think that this lack of
identity is natural to me as I often feel that I don’t ever belong wherever I
am. This lack of identity, in other words, snuck up on me. And now I find
myself feeling little sense of guilt, purpose, and passion.
No comments:
Post a Comment